﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: Revolver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.empiremovies.com/2005/10/19/movie-review-revolver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.empiremovies.com/2005/10/19/movie-review-revolver/</link>
	<description>Building an Empire. One Fan at a Time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:11:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johannes</title>
		<link>http://www.empiremovies.com/2005/10/19/movie-review-revolver/comment-page-1/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiremovies.com/?p=6192#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>I concur. There was a lot to like about this film, and if Ritchie had just stuck to the real world where people don&#039;t lose _their_ marbles just because _you&#039;ve_ conquered your ego, where what appears to have been a real world film for 90 minutes doesn&#039;t suddenly -- and worse, incoherently -- become a homily, a metaphor for one&#039;s mental world and the fight within, then the film could have stood on some pretty strong merits. Statham&#039;s ego&#039;s explosions were well-acted and edited, the loan sharks unusualness was very interesting, the restaurant scene and the marksman&#039;s defense of the kid n dad were all excellent. But, Liotta&#039;s final scene would have been soooooooo much better if he&#039;d been chasing Statham through the casino ordering him to fear him rather than standing there like a pussy crying to himself. No. For a faaaar better exposition of the ego and its willful destructiveness, look no further than &quot;The Sopranos&quot;, in which Tony is acted with menacing and self-destructive aplomb that you really hope Ritchie would take a lesson from. Fortunately, his follow-up, the Rock-n-rolla was superb. He&#039;s gotten Kabbala (and Madonna) out of his system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur. There was a lot to like about this film, and if Ritchie had just stuck to the real world where people don&#8217;t lose _their_ marbles just because _you&#8217;ve_ conquered your ego, where what appears to have been a real world film for 90 minutes doesn&#8217;t suddenly &#8212; and worse, incoherently &#8212; become a homily, a metaphor for one&#8217;s mental world and the fight within, then the film could have stood on some pretty strong merits. Statham&#8217;s ego&#8217;s explosions were well-acted and edited, the loan sharks unusualness was very interesting, the restaurant scene and the marksman&#8217;s defense of the kid n dad were all excellent. But, Liotta&#8217;s final scene would have been soooooooo much better if he&#8217;d been chasing Statham through the casino ordering him to fear him rather than standing there like a pussy crying to himself. No. For a faaaar better exposition of the ego and its willful destructiveness, look no further than &#8220;The Sopranos&#8221;, in which Tony is acted with menacing and self-destructive aplomb that you really hope Ritchie would take a lesson from. Fortunately, his follow-up, the Rock-n-rolla was superb. He&#8217;s gotten Kabbala (and Madonna) out of his system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
